On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:56:48 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

You are the only one who can't seem to follow a thread without ""'s.
Try really hard, pro. I posted on top so I hope that doesn't send you
crying to your boss, chuckles.

Actually, he's the only one who spoke up, twit.

YOU are the only poster I've run across in my 6-plus years on Usenet
who can't manage to quote posts properly.

(of course, everyone else considers it polite to follow the
established conventions...)

--
-denny-

"I don't like it when a whole state starts
acting like a marital aid."
"John R. Campbell" in a Usenet post.

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:56:48 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

You are the only one who can't seem to follow a thread without ""'s.
Try really hard, pro. I posted on top so I hope that doesn't send you
crying to your boss, chuckles.

Going to e-mail my boss again, Dank, in an attempt to get me censured
or fired?

Now go back to alt.cult.kiblogody

And you post there for what reason, stalker-boi?

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:59:28 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:56:48 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

You are the only one who can't seem to follow a thread without ""'s.
Try really hard, pro. I posted on top so I hope that doesn't send you
crying to your boss, chuckles.

Actually, he's the only one who spoke up, twit.

YOU are the only poster I've run across in my 6-plus years on Usenet
who can't manage to quote posts properly.

(of course, everyone else considers it polite to follow the
established conventions...)

Careful, Denny. Next thing you know, Dank here will be e-mailing your
boss to try to get you fired for posting to Usenet. He e-mailed my
boss with that intent.

Right, Dank?

I propose we deal with all the childish banter and "sand box" behavior the
way it would be dealt with in the real (off-line) world--by a cage match.
Let's get everyone together in a mutually-agreed upon central location, eat
some 'Q, then put all "the usual suspects" in the caged ring. Last one
standing gets to set the rules which determine posting method, off topic
versus on topic, quoting conventions, etc. We could even make it an annual
event, so that the challengers would have a chance to set the standards in
later years.

No use of folding chairs, no hidden foreign objects, no manager or
girlfriend participation. Gee, I'm smiling right now and I picture it in my
mind's eye...


"Denny Wheeler" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:56:48 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

You are the only one who can't seem to follow a thread without ""'s.
Try really hard, pro. I posted on top so I hope that doesn't send you
crying to your boss, chuckles.

Actually, he's the only one who spoke up, twit.

YOU are the only poster I've run across in my 6-plus years on Usenet
who can't manage to quote posts properly.

(of course, everyone else considers it polite to follow the
established conventions...)

--
-denny-

"I don't like it when a whole state starts
acting like a marital aid."
"John R. Campbell" in a Usenet post.

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:56:48 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

You are the only one who can't seem to follow a thread without ""'s.
Try really hard, pro. I posted on top so I hope that doesn't send you
crying to your boss, chuckles.

Going to e-mail my boss again, Dank, in an attempt to get me censured
or fired?

All jokes and banter aside, I never figured out why your boss took
action on something like this. I thought that was a little rinkydink in
the first place.

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:55:39 GMT, cl wrote:

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:56:48 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

You are the only one who can't seem to follow a thread without ""'s.
Try really hard, pro. I posted on top so I hope that doesn't send you
crying to your boss, chuckles.

Going to e-mail my boss again, Dank, in an attempt to get me censured
or fired?

All jokes and banter aside, I never figured out why your boss took
action on something like this. I thought that was a little rinkydink in
the first place.

He didn't take action. He said, "You have another stalker, and he's
e-mailing me to complain about you posting to Usenet. Be careful." End
of discussion.

You know, taking a Usenet squabble to real life that way is truly
reprehensible. But what makes it both reprehensible AND pathetic is
that Dank won't even admit what he did or otherwise take
responsibility for his actions. That's just sad and lame.

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 08:41:00 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:59:28 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

Careful, Denny. Next thing you know, Dank here will be e-mailing your
boss to try to get you fired for posting to Usenet. He e-mailed my
boss with that intent.

He be SOL if he tries. I don't have net access at work, nor time to
use it if I had it.


--
-denny-

"I don't like it when a whole state starts
acting like a marital aid."
"John R. Campbell" in a Usenet post.

So you have nothing to hide. Not the same, evidently, with Swilson.

Odd part is that his banter might give others who dislike him (there
seem to be a few) the idea to actually email a complaint his boss, wife,
doctor, whoever.

Denny Wheeler wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 08:41:00 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:


On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:59:28 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

Careful, Denny. Next thing you know, Dank here will be e-mailing your
boss to try to get you fired for posting to Usenet. He e-mailed my
boss with that intent.


He be SOL if he tries. I don't have net access at work, nor time to
use it if I had it.

"CS" wrote:
[top-post snipped]

PLONK!

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:28:59 GMT, I needed a babel fish to understand
EZ :

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 09:04:59 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

There's a way to make google quote properly. Don't recall what it is
though.

Or, you could just use Outlook Express with OE-QuoteFix:

http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/

Or, you could really go for broke and use Agent, which quotes
correctly, but costs $.

Of course, both options require a news server, which also usually
costs $$

EZ from St. Louis

Does Outlook Express pull info from Google groups? I didn't think
they allowed that. If they do now, very cool... if not OE will not
help them out in the least.
The OP is using Google Groups.
----------------------------------------
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from magic."
- Arthur C. Clarke

"LewZephyr" wrote in message

Does Outlook Express pull info from Google groups?

What do you mean by "Google Groups", do you mean only those groups that are
not true usenet groups? Google has allowed their users to create their own
groups that are not carried on usenet, so OE could not pull from those (and
they are very few), but as long as a NG is a "real" one, no problemo.

I didn't think
they allowed that. If they do now, very cool... if not OE will not
help them out in the least.

The OP is using Google Groups.

He's using Google's HTML interface to post and read a usenet group, much as
DejaNews allowed before them.

On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:19:40 -0700, I needed a babel fish to understand
"Duwop" :

"LewZephyr" wrote in message

Does Outlook Express pull info from Google groups?

What do you mean by "Google Groups", do you mean only those groups that are
not true usenet groups? Google has allowed their users to create their own
groups that are not carried on usenet, so OE could not pull from those (and
they are very few), but as long as a NG is a "real" one, no problemo.

Ya, I meant the actual usenet, not the groups... just the web
interface at Google refers to it as Google groups. Since the OP was
talking about using the Google web interface to post here... I figured
it was assumed (but we all know what happens there).


I didn't think
they allowed that. If they do now, very cool... if not OE will not
help them out in the least.

The OP is using Google Groups.

He's using Google's HTML interface to post and read a usenet group, much as
DejaNews allowed before them.

Yep, now back to the 2nd poster comment to use Outlook Express... can
it be configured to download Usenet posts from the free service
provided by Google?

In the end, the gist of my comment was I don't believe you can
configure Outlook Express to pull from Google to download Usenet
groups. Therefore the solution provided by the 2nd poster would not
resolve the issue.

good hunting...

----------------------------------------
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from magic."
- Arthur C. Clarke

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:58:56 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

So you have nothing to hide. Not the same, evidently, with Swilson.

Odd part is that his banter might give others who dislike him (there
seem to be a few) the idea to actually email a complaint his boss, wife,
doctor, whoever.

Are you implying that you intend to escalate your stalking, Dank? Just
let me know if that's what you mean. I assure you I'll respond
appropriately.

Why does my boss know your name, Dank? Why are you unwilling to take
responsility for your actions, Dank? Why aren't you man enough to
admit you e-mailed him to try to get me fired?

Give it up, Dank. You can repeat your big lie all you want, but not
even CAL believes that you didn't e-mail my boss, coward.

On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:40:52 GMT, LewZephyr
wrote:

In the end, the gist of my comment was I don't believe you can
configure Outlook Express to pull from Google to download Usenet
groups. Therefore the solution provided by the 2nd poster would not
resolve the issue.

I don't think the first ref. to OE was meant as 'use OE to d/l from
Google.'

I don't think you can use Google as a newsfeed. Just read using their
web interface.

However, on the 'news feed' front, there still are a very few free
servers out there.

--
-denny-

"I don't like it when a whole state starts
acting like a marital aid."
"John R. Campbell" in a Usenet post.

Ladies and Gentleman of AFB, welcome Dan Krueger back to the fold.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:14:54 -0400, Marc Goodman
wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:
Funny. Let's all follow along...

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
You got that right.

I know you are but what am I? Sheesh...

What exactly are you complaining about, Dank? Is he
being immature asking you to confess that you emailed
his boss? Is he being unfair accusing you without proving
that the email isn't a forgery? Is that your complaint?

You've been following him around for almost a year now
doing nothing but humping his leg, completely obsessessed,
contributing nothing to this group, and now you're complaining
that HE is being immature and unfair? Why don't you just
**** off and stop responding to him if it really bothers
you (or even if it doesn't really bother you, why don't
you just **** off anyway).