A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Food and Cooking » Barbecue
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables.

Water (box) or not?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14-07-2004, 04:19 AM
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Water (box) or not?

I thought I would poll the group for their opinion on whether or not to
build a water box or tank for steam purposes in a mobile bbq pit. I have
friends who have made pits and included a water box so that the meat will
stay moist. Others say good bbq, cooked right, is moist without all the
steam. What say y'all?

Thanks in advance for your kind, thoughtful replies...


  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 01:25 AM
Al Gartner
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Water (box) or not?

I've just recently moved over from water in the pan to sand in the pan.
There's been no discernable difference where the moisture of the meat is
concerned. From what I understand, the water is there as a temperature
buffer, not as a mosturizer. I also found that with going to sand - I get
better heat control than with H2o. Covering the sand with a bit of
aluminium foil (I use a vertical) also keeps the water pan a lot cleaner.
Plus I don't have to worry about 'drying' out and having the smoker temp get
out of control.

I imagine you could use rock or bricks, quarry tile, ceramic briquettes -
anything that will absorb and hold on to heat for a while.

Cheers,

-a.


wrote in message
...
I thought I would poll the group for their opinion on whether or not to
build a water box or tank for steam purposes in a mobile bbq pit. I have
friends who have made pits and included a water box so that the meat will
stay moist. Others say good bbq, cooked right, is moist without all the
steam. What say y'all?

Thanks in advance for your kind, thoughtful replies...




  #6 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 01:25 AM
Al Gartner
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Water (box) or not?

I've just recently moved over from water in the pan to sand in the pan.
There's been no discernable difference where the moisture of the meat is
concerned. From what I understand, the water is there as a temperature
buffer, not as a mosturizer. I also found that with going to sand - I get
better heat control than with H2o. Covering the sand with a bit of
aluminium foil (I use a vertical) also keeps the water pan a lot cleaner.
Plus I don't have to worry about 'drying' out and having the smoker temp get
out of control.

I imagine you could use rock or bricks, quarry tile, ceramic briquettes -
anything that will absorb and hold on to heat for a while.

Cheers,

-a.


wrote in message
...
I thought I would poll the group for their opinion on whether or not to
build a water box or tank for steam purposes in a mobile bbq pit. I have
friends who have made pits and included a water box so that the meat will
stay moist. Others say good bbq, cooked right, is moist without all the
steam. What say y'all?

Thanks in advance for your kind, thoughtful replies...




  #7 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 02:10 AM
Monroe, of course...
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Water (box) or not?

In article , "Al Gartner"
wrote:

I've just recently moved over from water in the pan to sand in the pan.
There's been no discernable difference where the moisture of the meat is
concerned. From what I understand, the water is there as a temperature
buffer, not as a mosturizer. I also found that with going to sand - I get
better heat control than with H2o. Covering the sand with a bit of
aluminium foil (I use a vertical) also keeps the water pan a lot cleaner.
Plus I don't have to worry about 'drying' out and having the smoker temp get
out of control.

I imagine you could use rock or bricks, quarry tile, ceramic briquettes -
anything that will absorb and hold on to heat for a while.


I can think of two benefits of water in the water pan.
1. You can add cold water if you're having a temp spike to bring the
temp down.
2. Grease fires don't happen.

monroe(exECB jockey)
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 17-07-2004, 05:15 AM
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Water (box) or not?


"M&M" wrote in message
...

On 14-Jul-2004, " BOB" wrote:

Dave Bugg wrote:
wrote:

I thought I would poll the group for their opinion on whether or not
to build a water box or tank for steam purposes in a mobile bbq pit.
I have friends who have made pits and included a water box so that
the meat will stay moist. Others say good bbq, cooked right, is
moist without all the steam. What say y'all?

I believe the biggest determiner of meat staying moist is to keep the
holding temperature consistent around 141 - 146F and use a good,

airtight
holding oven (whether or not it's your pit) that allows as little air
movement as possible. I don't believe humidifiers do much at all.


I always thought (and have been told, many times) that the water box was

so that
there would be hot water available for cleaning, washing, etc. *NOT* to

steam
the meat.

BOB



What BOB said;
Good Lord. I've always thought that youth is wasted on young people.

Kitchen
stoves in the past always had a water reservoir, but it didn't have

anything to
do with cooking. It was strictly there to make hot water as is the case

today.
Cooking over a weekend in the outback, without benefit of running water or

a
water heater can be a bitch. 8 or ten gallons of hot water from your

mobile pit
is a godsend.
--
M&M ("I'm over the hill and picking up speed, but my brakes are shot")


I can see the benefit of having hot water. The pit designs that I have seen
have an open water tank (picture an open suitcase on top of the fire box
with the half on the fire box covered, but half in the smoking pit uncovered
so steam can "moisten" the meat). I don't think that would be good for hot
water uses if you mean washing, etc. However, a little bit of know how
could have a similar situation with a closed water tank for the potable
water source. Thanks for the opinions and insights.


  #13 (permalink)  
Old 17-07-2004, 05:15 AM
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Water (box) or not?


"M&M" wrote in message
...

On 14-Jul-2004, " BOB" wrote:

Dave Bugg wrote:
wrote:

I thought I would poll the group for their opinion on whether or not
to build a water box or tank for steam purposes in a mobile bbq pit.
I have friends who have made pits and included a water box so that
the meat will stay moist. Others say good bbq, cooked right, is
moist without all the steam. What say y'all?

I believe the biggest determiner of meat staying moist is to keep the
holding temperature consistent around 141 - 146F and use a good,

airtight
holding oven (whether or not it's your pit) that allows as little air
movement as possible. I don't believe humidifiers do much at all.


I always thought (and have been told, many times) that the water box was

so that
there would be hot water available for cleaning, washing, etc. *NOT* to

steam
the meat.

BOB



What BOB said;
Good Lord. I've always thought that youth is wasted on young people.

Kitchen
stoves in the past always had a water reservoir, but it didn't have

anything to
do with cooking. It was strictly there to make hot water as is the case

today.
Cooking over a weekend in the outback, without benefit of running water or

a
water heater can be a bitch. 8 or ten gallons of hot water from your

mobile pit
is a godsend.
--
M&M ("I'm over the hill and picking up speed, but my brakes are shot")


I can see the benefit of having hot water. The pit designs that I have seen
have an open water tank (picture an open suitcase on top of the fire box
with the half on the fire box covered, but half in the smoking pit uncovered
so steam can "moisten" the meat). I don't think that would be good for hot
water uses if you mean washing, etc. However, a little bit of know how
could have a similar situation with a closed water tank for the potable
water source. Thanks for the opinions and insights.


 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.food.sourdough FAQ.Starter.Doctor Darrell Greenwood Sourdough 0 25-04-2004 09:22 AM
rec.food.sourdough FAQ.Starter.Doctor Darrell Greenwood Sourdough 0 06-04-2004 12:05 PM
H2O PENMART01 General Cooking 0 17-02-2004 09:46 PM
rec.food.sourdough FAQ.Starter.Doctor Darrell Greenwood Sourdough 0 04-01-2004 12:34 PM
rec.food.sourdough FAQ.Starter.Doctor Darrell Greenwood Sourdough 0 18-11-2003 11:36 AM

fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Card Consolidation - Credit Cards UK - Car Loan - New York Hotels - Hotels