![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
cl wrote:
"Jack Curry" Jack-Curry deletethis @cfl.rr.com wrote in message om... I suppose, Jason in Dallas, that if you can't tell the difference in taste between food cooked on propane versus food cooked on charcoal, or if button-pushing convenience is more important to you than cooking better tasting food, then a gasser is right for you. Jack do you think that a steak done under a salamander at Ruth Chris tastes as good or better than that done on charcoal? No, it doesn't. I was singularly unimpressed with the steak the one time I ate at a Ruth Chris. It had an oily taste, like the scent of propane. The prime rib that someone else had was much better. Beth -- The problems of the world cannot possibly be solved by skeptics or cynics whose horizons are limited by the obvious realities. We need men who can dream of things that never were. --John F. Kennedy our home page: http://www.IsleOfSky.net |
|
|||
|
"Jack Curry" wrote
"Jason in Dallas" wrote: He'll never get it, CL. Oftentimes a gas grill is a helluva lot more convenient than charcoal. I use my gasser 10x as much as I cook with charcoal (grilling or smoking). I suppose, Jason in Dallas, that if you can't tell the difference in taste between food cooked on propane versus food cooked on charcoal, or if button-pushing convenience is more important to you than cooking better tasting food, then a gasser is right for you. You should check your assumptions before you get so smug. I *can* tell the difference, but when I toss some wood chunks in the gasser the difference is extremely subtle and I cannot taste the difference any more. Both methods are grilling and there is wood smoke applied, the difefrence being one method is a lot easier than the other. In fact I'd challenge you to differentiate, and would happily bet a large sum of money that you couldn't tell assuming a proper double-blind study where we did it a number of times to see if you could do significantly better than random guessing. I don't know what else to say: I have 1 and 1/2 jobs, I'm also in school working on another degree, I have a wife and a son, I own a home I try to keep up with, I have other hobbies ... my time is important to me and I use the gasser a whole lot than my charcoal rig. Yes, it's due to convenience but I'm here to tell you the quality of food is not sufefring. I smoked a couple butts on the bullet smoker last weekend and they were great and I enjoyed the hours of work, but tonight I'll be quickly grilling a couple fillets mignon on the gasser. I *could* get out the charcoal, the chimney, wad up some newspaper, start up the chimney, assemble the grill, clean my hands, then clean up the mess when the chimnety is ready, then dump the charcoal in the grill, then clean up the ashes when I'm done ... but it's a lot easier to push a button and toss in a couple wood chunks before cooking in the gasser. Until you cook on a decent gasser with cast iron grates and wood chunks for flavor you don't know that the difference is negligible to non-existent. |
|
|||
|
"Duwop" wrote in message
... wrote: much MORE to the OP than cooking over a real wood fire, then maybe he is too busy and should stop and smell the wood smoke... I don't buy that too busy thing either, that's a cop out designed to make the person feel more important. If you were like me and had 1 and 1/2 jobs, were studying for a second degree, married, a homeowner, had a 6 month old baby at home you love to spend time with, and other hobbies besides cooking ... you would "buy the too busy thing" guaranteed. Apparently you have more free time than I do and that's great, I am suitably jealous of that but not your of inability to reason. I cook over real wood fire at times, but 10x as often I fire up the gasser, toss in some wood chunks and let 'er rip. I simply have better or more important things to do than mess with charcoal most of the time. |
|
|||
|
Well, I'm not going to diss anyone for what they cook on, it's a lot more in
the cook than the equipment IMHO. However, in my personal experience, moving from using a Weber for many years, to a Kamado, my results got significantly better, particularly for low and slow. It is very difficult to keep a Weber going and at a constant temp for many hours or overnight, whereas with a K it's pretty easy. More well suited equipment may not be essential, but it certainly makes it a lot easier. Duwop wrote: Its not being lazy. We use all sorts of implements to speed up the cooking process, so why is a gasser any worse than a foodprocessor, salad spinner or even an electric oven. Likewise, why have a kamado since you can do just as long low and slow cooks on a kettle given the time and effort? Sure ribs on a regular ol'gas grill is lazy if you have the time and the equipment to do it right. As for steaks, chicken, burger, chops, dogs and fish is can be just as good or better. A TEC is a gasser is anyone want to argue with that assertion....and a smoke box works for grilling and roasting.... |
|
|||
|
Jason in Dallas wrote (twice in one thread):
If you were like me and had 1 and 1/2 jobs, were studying for a second degree, married, a homeowner, had a 6 month old baby at home you love to spend time with, and other hobbies besides cooking ... you would "buy the too busy thing" guaranteed. Apparently you have more free time than I do and that's great, I am suitably jealous of that Yes, it's true. All the charcoal-junkies on this list are homeless, unemployed, never had no fancy schoolin' and long ago the wife left and took the young un's ("It's either me or that damn grill! Lord Almighty, I believe you love that charcoal more than you love your own kin! And don't come trying to get me to stay by huggin' me with those damn ol' charcoal dust-stained hands!"). Got no interests, no hobbies, nothin'. Chained to this grill, live in a tent with only a charcoal chimney for a pillow. But here's 2 questions- Where do you get the time to post all this on the internet? You're not stealing time from you bosses, are you? Do you have to take a vacation day when your propane tank is empty to go get it filled? g Hey, hey, remember, I'm jesskidden........ |
|
|||
|
Well no one's died and left me in charge of defining "barbecue", but the
way I use the word, it's not grilling, though they're related, about like badminton and tennis. That said, if a person's got a gas grill that they used as a convenient way to grill burgers, steaks, chicken, and then gets interested in the fascinating business of long, slow cooking of meats in smoke, I expect they could spend a lot of time very pleasantly, and have potentially excellent results, figuring out ways to duplicate on the gas grill the kinds of things discussed in newsgroups like this one. All the elements are there - heat source which can be direct or indirect, controllable introduction of wood smoke into the mix, etc. etc. Now once a person's really bitten by the bug, they're going to end up burning wood down to coals, and cooking on that, same way that some Civil War re-enactors aren't going to call it a night and head for the Holiday Inn, when the sun goes down and the mosquitos re-enact Pickett's Charge on a rainy night. But if I were such a hard-bitten Civil War re-enactor, I'd feel a closer kinship with a person who spent the day at Manassas and took off for the Holiday Inn after dark, than for the one who never left libraries studying strategy, and I'd be glad, myself, that he'd bothered to join the games at all. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
In article , Beth Cole
wrote: No, it doesn't. I was singularly unimpressed with the steak the one time I ate at a Ruth Chris. It had an oily taste, like the scent of propane. The prime rib that someone else had was much better. Hear hear- RC does buy good meat (for a chain) and they do sear and char well and their broilers seem to know what they're doing (I've eaten at the Houston original and one out east in either NC or VA or TN I fergit....) They butter the **** out of their steaks. Kinda over kill in my book. I'd rather cook my own. I can do a lot better. And wear shorts and a t-short doin it. monroe(and cheaper too) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
kilikini wrote in alt.food.barbecue
Hey, I'd love a man that could BBQ up a storm and drink beer with me all day - as long as we could afford lump instead of store brand briquettes and as long as we could afford brisket to burgers. Dang. You men are lookin' in the wrong places (unless you're not lookin' at all). :~) Killi, I bbq up a good downpour and ain't got nothin else to do all day but drink and Q. And I won't use brick-ecks. I rarely have burgers mostly brisketts and pork shoulders and ribs. I'm lookin. -- BigDog To E-mail me, you know what to do. |
|
|||
|
OK...first off thanks for everyone's input!
Well I can see why people like charcoal vs. gas, but I guess I am just looking for what charcoal grill people recommend, and WHY. It sounds like the Kamado holds heat for long periods well, but I am looking for something to grill some steaks/burgers/chicken/brats on in a couple hours. Not long term or overnight cooking (althought that would be an added benefit to have that capability). I am also interested in how hard it is to clean out. I think I mentioned in my opening thread that I found the pan that Weber uses to be interesting because you can just un-hook it, dump it out, and replace it. Seems like a fairly clean and straight-forward process.I do realize that charcoal is going to be dirty, I guess I am looking for the most convenience for my money as well. If I am going to spend around or over $1000 for a charcoal grill, I sure hope it has some amenities to make it worth it. Obviously cooking ability is number one, but what about 2...3....4...etc. The other grill I saw mentioned was the Hasty Bake, although only once. This looks interesting because you can raise and lower the charcoal with a crank to adjust cooking temperature. Does this really work or is it a gimmick?? Although it is ugly, it appears to be functionally adequate. Anyone have one or use one before?? I dunno, I guess I am just looking for the "ultimate" barbecue that satisfies a lot of the things non-charcoal grillers find objectionable to charcoal grilling. Whenever I bring up charcoal grilling to friends, they say "why when you can cook with gas and its much more convenient". Obviously they dont understand (or care about) the flavor difference so I was hoping to find an up-scale charcoal grill that knocks these assumptions about charcoal grilling to the ground. Is there such a thing?? Thanks again to everyone!! Todd |
|
|||
|
Todd wrote:
It sounds like the Kamado holds heat for long periods well, but I am looking for something to grill some steaks/burgers/chicken/brats on in a couple hours. The Kamado is also an EXCELLENT grill- can easily get temp's of 500 degrees for cooking steak in [not hours] but 4-5 minutes, which is the reason I got it (before that I was going to go the "smoker" and "Weber kettle" route...) I am also interested in how hard it is to clean out. Well, you don't clean it out everytime you grill, as you (and others) have implied. I've had my K for 1 1/2 years, cook on it 2 or 3 times a week all year long and have done a "total clean out" maybe 5 times. Usually I just scoop out excess ash that might block the air flow via the bottom door. When you use lump charcoal you get a lot LESS ash than with briquettes. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Dave Bugg wrote:
wrote: The Kamado is also an EXCELLENT grill- can easily get temp's of 500 degrees for cooking steak in [not hours] but 4-5 minutes, which is the reason I got it (before that I was going to go the "smoker" and "Weber kettle" route...) And if you wait a few more minutes, you can get temps up around 700 or so. A few more minutes, and the thermometer will lap itself. It can be quite scary :-). Oh, yeah, but I didn't want to let it get too hot and scare the fellow off g. Was doing chicken thighs last night and wasn't really paying close attention to what was going on under the dome. These suckers really had a lot of fat and I didn't trim them so the old round cast iron griddle I use to do "indirect" and prevent flare-ups caught all the chicken fat and caught fire. I had decided I was going to go "old fashioned" and use standard tomato based BBQ from a bottle and, well, I had no problem "carmelizing" it... g OH, yeah, and the K makes an excellent OVEN as well as a GRILL and a SMOKER. |
|
|||
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| how much charcoal | Tim | Barbecue | 7 | 12-06-2004 11:53 PM |
| Does charcoal add any "smoke" taste? | Dave K. | Barbecue | 34 | 24-03-2004 09:23 AM |
| Palm charcoal | Yip Yap | Barbecue | 0 | 20-03-2004 07:31 PM |
| Brinkmann Gourmet Charcoal Smoker & Grill - Viable Grilling & Smoking Solution? | Jake | Barbecue | 3 | 10-03-2004 09:51 PM |