"Monroe, of course..." wrote in message
...
In article ,
wrote:

"cl" wrote:
[]if no cure is used (mortons quicktender, citric acid ect)
then you must cook to be safe. I personally wouldn't touch cooked
jerky
because it would be like going to the local cheap steak joint.

I must be French. I give up.

Then say,"Mange de la merde et va mourir,c(aca)l(oco)."
"Va te faire foutre,c(ock)l(icker)" would work, too.

monroe(de nada,esse)

My precious troll, tell Miranda your a homo and all will be well. It seems
every post of your to me involves licking cock.

-CAL

"Monroe, of course..." wrote in message
...

Is this the same cl(it) that chided everyone else for their poor
reading comprehension? Huh! Maybe his own brain is c(oliform)l(aden)
and could use a few hours in an oven for safety's sake.....

monroe(c(honically)l(aughing))

Dipshit Monroe, you might want to read the multiple links yourself if you
think that marinade (not cured) meat is safe when held at 100degree
temperatures for many hours. This is what you are supporting by chidding me
on this.

-CAL

"Monroe, of course..." wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

"cl" wrote:
[]if no cure is used (mortons quicktender, citric acid ect)
then you must cook to be safe. I personally wouldn't touch cooked
jerky because it would be like going to the local cheap steak joint.

I must be French. I give up.

Then say,"Mange de la merde et va mourir,c(aca)l(oco)."
"Va te faire foutre,c(ock)l(icker)" would work, too.

monroe(de nada,esse)

You are so cultured, Monroe. I should have paid more attention in school
(and in life).

I was just struck by the fact that on the one hand he/she/it says,
". . . you must cook to be safe" and in the next breath says, "I personally
wouldn't touch cooked jerky!"

--
Intuitive insights from Nick, Retired in the San Fernando Valley
"La vie et un tartine de merde, mais il foux savoir l'aprete."

http://operationiraqichildren.org/

wrote in message
...
I was just struck by the fact that on the one hand he/she/it says,
". . . you must cook to be safe" and in the next breath says, "I
personally
wouldn't touch cooked jerky!"


I guess you are such a dumbass that the fact you clipped "if no cure is used
(mortons quicktender, citric acid ect) then
" would escape you that the meaning is changed.


Pure and simple idiot you are nick. Be a man and admit your err.

-CAL

In article ,
wrote:

"Monroe, of course..." wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

I must be French. I give up.

Then say,"Mange de la merde et va mourir,c(aca)l(oco)."
"Va te faire foutre,c(ock)l(icker)" would work, too.

You are so cultured, Monroe.

I eat yogurt and kimchi but not usually mixed.....

I should have paid more attention in school
(and in life).

Yeah - lingo classes and verb tenses come and go but the profanity
stays etched into the long term memory for time eternal.
like: 'CAL es un pendejo.'

I was just struck by the fact that on the one hand he/she/it says,

"She/it" now that's an apt description of cl(it) for sure! That's how
we say it in the south- 'sheeeeyit!'

". . . you must cook to be safe" and in the next breath says, "I personally
wouldn't touch cooked jerky!"

That is plumb retarded, isn't it? (Speaking of "touch"ed and "jerk"y)

monroe(love that heaven beef stuff, BTW)

"cl" wrote:
wrote in message
I was just struck by the fact that on the one hand he/she/it says,
". . . you must cook to be safe" and in the next breath says, "I
personally wouldn't touch cooked jerky!"

I guess you are such a dumbass that the fact you clipped "if no cure is
used (mortons quicktender, citric acid ect) then
" would escape you that the meaning is changed.

Pure and simple idiot you are nick. Be a man and admit your err.

Doesn't change the fact that you said, without a "if no cure is used"
disclaimer, "I personally wouldn't touch cooked jerky!"

But you're right, I am a pure and simple idiot and despite wearing a
pakhama, a man. I admit the error of thinking that you were worth debating
with. Go **** yerself, asshole!

PS I wasn't talking to ya, I was talking aboutcha.

--
Intuitive insights from Nick, Retired in the San Fernando Valley

http://operationiraqichildren.org/

wrote:

"cl" wrote:
wrote in message
I was just struck by the fact that on the one hand he/she/it says,
". . . you must cook to be safe" and in the next breath says, "I
personally wouldn't touch cooked jerky!"

I guess you are such a dumbass that the fact you clipped "if no cure is
used (mortons quicktender, citric acid ect) then
" would escape you that the meaning is changed.
Pure and simple idiot you are nick. Be a man and admit your err.

Doesn't change the fact that you said, without a "if no cure is used"
disclaimer, "I personally wouldn't touch cooked jerky!"


Use that wee bit of intellect and make the logical connection: since
jerky is not safe without using cure or cooking, and cooking will change
the results to the point that the resulting "jerky" is not very good, I
would use cure to make jerky.

Not a hard conclusion for a 96pointer to make.


But you're right, I am a pure and simple idiot and despite wearing a
pakhama, a man. I admit the error of thinking that you were worth debating
with. Go **** yerself, asshole!
PS I wasn't talking to ya, I was talking aboutcha.

Nor were you trying to debate me or else your top most comment would
have been directed toward me. You tried to take the pussy route of
trying to jump on the bash cl bandwagon, and still fell on your ass
without anyone but my favorite eunuch 'net stalker Monroe to brush you
off.

-CAL

Nick speaks the truth,

" I admit the error of thinking that you were worth
debating with. Go **** yerself, asshole!"

Show cl(it) your killfile, Nick. Leave him and his new butt-buddy Kunt to
each other.

Jack

Jack Curry wrote:

Nick speaks the truth,

" I admit the error of thinking that you were worth
debating with. Go **** yerself, asshole!"

Show cl(it) your killfile, Nick. Leave him and his new butt-buddy Kunt to
each other.

Jack


I'm sorry Jack, I thought that plonk sound I heard from you was you
killfiling me. Apparently it was you pulling your head out of your ass
ad infintium instead.

-CAL

cl wrote:
n[]You tried to take the pussy route of
trying to jump on the bash cl bandwagon, and still fell on your ass
without anyone but my favorite eunuch 'net stalker Monroe to brush you
off.

Here's the big difference, moron: I've had debates, arguments and
disagreements with Monroe and many of the others here, but they have always
been congenial, respectful, humorous and friendly. You, on the other hand,
have proven yourself to be an ill-mannered, uneducated lout, incapable of
anything besides ad hominum attacks! Take comfort in knowing that, despite
this, I feel sorry for you.

--
Intuitive insights from Nick, Retired in the San Fernando Valley

http://operationiraqichildren.org/

wrote:
cl wrote nothing of note:

Take comfort in knowing that, despite this, I feel sorry for you.

IOW: Feel his pity.


--

"Jack Curry" Jack-Curry deletethis @cfl.rr.com wrote:
Nick speaks the truth,

" I admit the error of thinking that you were worth
debating with. Go **** yerself, asshole!"

Show cl(it) your killfile, Nick. Leave him and his new butt-buddy Kunt
to each other.

I've never killfiled anyone, Jack, although there are several worthy of the
distinction. I kinda feel like if I *killfile* them, I'm giving them more
stature in a NG I luv. I will NOT give up my NGs to these sorry *******s.
So on occasion, I will simply make my point that they are acting like
morons. They don't like it? Shape up or ship out! Them heaping their abuse
on me is like tryin' ta **** up a rope. Like I shiv a git!

--
Intuitive insights from Nick, Retired in the San Fernando Valley

http://operationiraqichildren.org/

___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do |
/ O O\__ NOT |
/ \ feed the |
/ \ \ trolls |
/ _ \ \ ______________|
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ \ __||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | /| | --|
| | |// |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ // |
/ _ \\ _ // | /
* / \_ /- | - | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

wrote:

I've never killfiled anyone, Jack, although there are several worthy of the
distinction. I kinda feel like if I *killfile* them, I'm giving them more
stature in a NG I luv.


Yes, but if you are the only one arguing back and forth with some
cretin, then all of us get to see his posts even though we have
killfiled him. You don't have to KF the guy, but you don't have to reply
to his flamebait either.




Brian Rodenborn

wrote:
"Jack Curry" Jack-Curry deletethis @cfl.rr.com wrote:
Nick speaks the truth,

" I admit the error of thinking that you were worth
debating with. Go **** yerself, asshole!"

Show cl(it) your killfile, Nick. Leave him and his new butt-buddy
Kunt to each other.

I've never killfiled anyone, Jack, although there are several worthy
of the distinction. I kinda feel like if I *killfile* them, I'm
giving them more stature in a NG I luv. I will NOT give up my NGs to
these sorry *******s. So on occasion, I will simply make my point
that they are acting like morons. They don't like it? Shape up or
ship out! Them heaping their abuse on me is like tryin' ta **** up a
rope. Like I shiv a git!

Choose your own path, friend...but the reason I suggested you killfile is
that when you respond to a dolt like cl(it), I see his drivel along with
your response, even though I chose to kill the twit.
I can live with that and it's no big deal, but I guess you'd agree that it's
nicer around here when we don't have to suffer fools.

Jack