Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 19:26:50 -0400, " BOB" wrote:

Oh, let's just cut to the chase, BOB. **** you, truly.

I thought the quote (before the movie a few years ago) was "cut to the chaff"
Look it up. It actually makes much more sense than the Hollywood version.


PLONK.

I thought you said that to Fosco, too. But you've been quoting and arguing with
him, haven't you.
Hypocrite!


--
Kevin S. Wilson

I guess I hit the nail on the head?

If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen!

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 19:26:50 -0400, " BOB" wrote:

Oh, let's just cut to the chase, BOB. **** you, truly.

PLONK.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho
"Who put these fingerprints on my imagination?"

Ya might want to get this addy too, since I use both. Neither account seems to
get the full set of posts.

BOB
PS. Same to ya, loser.

if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

On 05 Jun 2004 22:47:17 GMT, wrote:

"Duwop" wrote:
[ . . . ]
You gotta think the insurance companies run the gov't. Most regulations
like these are motivated by them.

Oh. Like seat belt and motorcycle helmet laws for adults?

Those things work, and work well, Nick. Check in with the Emergency
Response Ambulance guys if you have doubts. The other things that
need to be banned are three-wheeled ATV's.

BTW, I spent a lifetime one Winter living on the 19th floor of a
cliff. I got so needfull of a meal of burned meat, that I fired up a
little tine Hibachi grill for two steaks. A breeze came along, caught
some cinders off it and ruined the rug two flats over. I support the
rule that if you are a cliff dweller, you cannot grill or BBQ on your
'standard sized' balcony.

Harry

Harry Demidavicius wrote:
On 05 Jun 2004 22:47:17 GMT, wrote:

"Duwop" wrote:
[ . . . ]
You gotta think the insurance companies run the gov't. Most
regulations like these are motivated by them.

Oh. Like seat belt and motorcycle helmet laws for adults?

Those things work, and work well, Nick. Check in with the Emergency
Response Ambulance guys if you have doubts. The other things that
need to be banned are three-wheeled ATV's.

That's all well and good, Harry, but I don't need the goddamned gubmin
forcing me to pertect me from myself! Darwinism'll take care of that!

--
Intuitive insights from Nick, Retired in the San Fernando Valley

http://operationiraqichildren.org/

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:10:56 -0700, "F.G. Whitfurrows"
wrote:

wrote:
"F.G. Whitfurrows" wrote:
wrote:

Fosco, why are you bothering?

It was early, Nick. I was out of my mind. All I did was politely
ask him to killfile me.:)

Bullshit. What you did was change the subject line, snip my
questioning of your absurd conspiracy theory, and called me a
prick--all because you haven't a chance in hell of backing up your
ridiculous statements and you know it. Go ahead and try, though. I'm
dying to hear all about the insidious conspiracy that enables the
insurance industry to dictate fire-and-safety building codes.

Remember, the shiny side of the tin-foil hat faces out.


My my, Kevvie bear. Aren't we gettin' just a bit wound up tonight? You
should, really, just try to calm down. Take a coupla deep breaths and bring
yourself to the realization that I don't give a rat's ass what you say about
me. You just make yourself look like an ass. And on top of it all it's
becoming quite apparent that you really *do* care what I say about you. I
mean look at ya, honey. That li'l vein you always talk about is startin to
stick up and turn purple and you're droolin' all over your little self in
your attempts to make me feel stupid. sigh

See, Kevvie, for most of us its about laughs. you're takin this way to
seriously.

--
Fosco Gamgee Whitfurrows
and his 6" boner

Oh...and for the record....it wasn't me that suggested the insurance company
was behind it all. I just took it little further. Purely for your
entertainment, of course.

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 19:26:50 -0400, " BOB" wrote:

Oh, let's just cut to the chase, BOB. **** you, truly.

PLONK.

A wuss I tell you! Plonk this, plonk that-dude just needs to get some.

-CAL

wrote in message
...

That's all well and good, Harry, but I don't need the goddamned gubmin
forcing me to pertect me from myself! Darwinism'll take care of that!


Yeah. Well, it is just taking a bit longer than usual in your case.

pavane

On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 19:16:52 -0500, Steve Wertz
wrote:

On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:19:16 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

BTW, I have no illusions that the insurance industry plays a role in
and exerts some influence over the creation of building codes. I
didn't fall off a turnip truck on the way into town, and I never said
that the insurance industry plays no such role.

Well, since my name was already brought up in this thread....

"I'm dying to hear all about the insidious conspiracy that enables
the insurance industry to dictate fire-and-safety building codes."

If you agree, even to some extent, then why are you [two] making a
big deal of it?

Because I get tired of seeing know-nothings spouting recycled rants
about Big Gummit. I get particularly tired of them oversimplifying
complex subjects by cynically asserting that every act of government
is a direct result of some corrupt action on the part of a lobbying
group or the rich.

To say that fire-and-safety codes come about SOLELY because the
insurance industry wants to earn more money is not only incorrect,
it's downright foolish, simplistic, and naive. Things aren't that
simple, except in the minds of the know-nothings, and their bleatings
sound to me like nothing so much as the grumbling resentment of
peasants.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:08:05 -0700, "F.G. Whitfurrows"
wrote:

See, Kevvie, for most of us its about laughs. you're takin this way to
seriously.

Your insight into my motivations and state of mind are as
well-informed as your understanding of fire-and-safety codes.

Let's recap:

You said something stupid and simplistic. I pointed out that it was
stupid and simplistic. You changed the subject and ran away, rather
than defend or explain your position. That about right?

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:27:16 GMT, Harry Demidavicius
wrote:

The other things that
need to be banned are three-wheeled ATV's.

Aren't they already? I don't think they've been manufactured for
decades now.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:08:05 -0700, "F.G. Whitfurrows"
wrote:

See, Kevvie, for most of us its about laughs. you're takin this way to
seriously.

Your insight into my motivations and state of mind are as
well-informed as your understanding of fire-and-safety codes.

Let's recap:

You said something stupid and simplistic. I pointed out that it was
stupid and simplistic. You changed the subject and ran away, rather
than defend or explain your position. That about right?

HUH?

Doesn't that sound just about what Kevvie did right befor he "PLONKed" me"


--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote

See, Kevvie, for most of us its about laughs. you're takin this way to
seriously.

Your insight into my motivations and state of mind are as
well-informed as your understanding of fire-and-safety codes.


So you're saying that for you acting like a complete ******* and trying to
make other people feel and look stupid, as you always tend to try to do, by
rehashing your self righteous clown act is about laughs? Just as I've always
suspected.
Do you really feel so bad about the state of your life that you have to make
up for your shortcomings by giving other people grief for your own
entertainment?

Let's recap:

You said something stupid and simplistic. I pointed out that it was
stupid and simplistic. You changed the subject and ran away, rather
than defend or explain your position. That about right?


Nope, I refused to argue the point with you because I think you're a prick.
Didn't I make that perfectly clear in the first place?

And as I stated before, I didn't come up with the insurance company idea,
someone else did. I just played with it a little, and somehow that bothered
*you*. Funny.

Enjoy your evening Kevvie.

--
Fosco Gamgee Whitfurrows
and his 6" boner

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:09:23 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 00:27:16 GMT, Harry Demidavicius
wrote:

The other things that
need to be banned are three-wheeled ATV's.

Aren't they already? I don't think they've been manufactured for
decades now.

I understand that, Kevin, but, unlike automobiles, these things don't
die. There's a ton of them out there still maiming and killing
people.

Harry

On 07 Jun 2004 00:36:09 GMT, wrote:

Harry Demidavicius wrote:
On 05 Jun 2004 22:47:17 GMT, wrote:

"Duwop" wrote:
[ . . . ]
You gotta think the insurance companies run the gov't. Most
regulations like these are motivated by them.

Oh. Like seat belt and motorcycle helmet laws for adults?

Those things work, and work well, Nick. Check in with the Emergency
Response Ambulance guys if you have doubts. The other things that
need to be banned are three-wheeled ATV's.

That's all well and good, Harry, but I don't need the goddamned gubmin
forcing me to pertect me from myself! Darwinism'll take care of that!

The Gov't doesn't give a rip about you, Nick, shocking as that news
might be to you ;0) But it costs a lot more money to patch folks up
than to halter and helmet them.

Harry

Harry Demidavicius wrote:
On 07 Jun 2004 00:36:09 GMT, wrote:
Harry Demidavicius wrote:
[ . . . ]
The Gov't doesn't give a rip about you, Nick, shocking as that news
might be to you ;0)

Ohmigawd! As long as they keep out of my life and don't give me as much
gubmin as I pay for, that's fine by me.

But it costs a lot more money to patch folks up than to halter and
helmet them.

That's all well and good, Harry, but I pay for insurance and I don't need
the goddamned gubmin forcing me to pertect me from myself! Darwinism'll
take care of that! What's next? Requiring me ta have a safety man on the
ladder when I'm cleanin' out the rain gutters? Requirin' me ta use jack
stands when workin' under my car? Prudent people do these things already.
As fer the others, Darwinism'll take care of them, too.

This is my last post on this subject. I accept e-mail.

--
Intuitive insights from Nick, Retired in the San Fernando Valley

http://operationiraqichildren.org/