![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On 8-Apr-2004, Eddie wrote: snippage Now for questions, what's the difference between chunks and lump? Chunks are raw wood. Lump is baked (carbonized) chunks. The bags say you can use chunks as a primary fuel instead of charcoal. Yep sir. You can. Lots of folks use raw wood, but the preferred method is to burn it down to coals before putting it in the pit. Otherwise the smoke is hard to control. Can be done though. Does chunk last as long as lump? Don't know. I've used logs, but not chunks. Wouldn't chunks be difficult to start? On the bag it recommends stacking in pyramid and using newspaper. Wouldn't a chimney work? Wood isn't particularly had to start. You do have a fairly lengthy delay before you get enough heat to effectively manage the smoke. Any time you let the fire get too low and then have to add more fuel, intense smoke is going to be a problem. You have to size the fire very carefully and then keep up with it practically minute by minute. Too big, too much heat. Too small, too hard to control. How about flavor? If you can control it, you can't beat the flavor, provided the type of wood suits your taste. Lot of people complain about mesquite for instance and raw mesquite in a confined pit is a real bitch. Hickory chunks should be managable. Don't risk anything expensive until you figure it out. Dense smoke will really screw up an otherwise fine piece of meat. -- M&M ("When You're Over The Hill You Pick Up Speed") |
|
|||
|
Eddie wrote: I was browsing at a Wal-Mart and found hickory wood chunks for $4.97 a 2/3 cubic foot bag. Weight about 19 lbs. I then did a web search and found a site that sells the same thing for $7.00 for a 1/3 cubic foot bag and weight of 10 lbs. Plus shipping charges. So, is Wal-Mart chunks a good buy? I would think so. I have never used hickory wood chunks before. Now for questions, what's the difference between chunks and lump? The bags say you can use chunks as a primary fuel instead of charcoal. Does chunk last as long as lump? Wouldn't chunks be difficult to start? On the bag it recommends stacking in pyramid and using newspaper. Wouldn't a chimney work? How about flavor? Any chunk users out there? I'm thinking of getting 4 or 5 bags. Eddie Eddie, Lump is charred wood. I have seen instructions on the net for making lump, but is difficult for me to explain in a posting. So I will just say that lump is made from a wood and is black. And regular chunks, are just that, chunks of wood. Have never tried starting chunks, but yes I would imagine a chimney would work. Though you may need to use some kindling to help get it started. Or lots of newspaper. There was a thread recently on whether lump produces any flavor. The consensus it seemed, was that lump produces little flavor. Chunks though, I would guess would produce a more pronounced flavor than using a few chunks in a batch of coals or lump. At $5/20 lb. buy some and try it out. Let us know how you like it, too. If you don't like using all chunks, obviously you can go back to using a few chunks on coals/lump. HTH. Happy Q'en, BBQ |
|
|||
|
Eddie wrote:
I was browsing at a Wal-Mart and found hickory wood chunks for $4.97 a 2/3 cubic foot bag. Weight about 19 lbs. I then did a web search and found a site that sells the same thing for $7.00 for a 1/3 cubic foot bag and weight of 10 lbs. Plus shipping charges. So, is Wal-Mart chunks a good buy? I would think so. I have never used hickory wood chunks before. Now for questions, what's the difference between chunks and lump? The bags say you can use chunks as a primary fuel instead of charcoal. Does chunk last as long as lump? Wouldn't chunks be difficult to start? On the bag it recommends stacking in pyramid and using newspaper. Wouldn't a chimney work? How about flavor? Any chunk users out there? I'm thinking of getting 4 or 5 bags. Eh Eddie, Chunk is dried wood. If you burn it, you get lots of smoke. Lump is wood that has been processed so that it's mostly carbon. If you burn it, you don't get much smoke. I haven't burned straight wood as a fuel source in my WSM. In theory, you would get longer burn time using chunk vs. lump. I throw a few chunks onto my lit coals for smoke, and that provides plenty of flavor. -- Aloha, Nathan Lau San Jose, CA #include std.disclaimer |
|
|||
|
In article , Eddie
wrote: I was browsing at a Wal-Mart and found hickory wood chunks for $4.97 a 2/3 cubic foot bag. Weight about 19 lbs. I then did a web search and found a site that sells the same thing for $7.00 for a 1/3 cubic foot bag and weight of 10 lbs. Plus shipping charges. So, is Wal-Mart chunks a good buy? I would think so. I have never used hickory wood chunks before. Now for questions, what's the difference between chunks and lump? The bags say you can use chunks as a primary fuel instead of charcoal. Does chunk last as long as lump? Wouldn't chunks be difficult to start? On the bag it recommends stacking in pyramid and using newspaper. Wouldn't a chimney work? How about flavor? Any chunk users out there? I'm thinking of getting 4 or 5 bags. Using pure wood as fuel means you'll need to pre burn the chunks, kinda like you would with briquettes. The chunks will flame up and create lotsa nasty smoke when you first light them in a pile. Another problem is the amount of ash they'll leave behind. For firing up a chiminea, however, plunk'em in and light'em up. Just don't cook over them until they're coals. monroe(who does use this stuff wrapped in foil for smoking wood) |
|
|||
|
Eddie wrote:
what's the difference between chunks and lump? Chucks is raw wood that's been dried. Lump is dried chunks that have been partially burned. The bags say you can use chunks as a primary fuel instead of charcoal. Does chunk last as long as lump? The problem with usin chunks is the time in gettin them down to coals for cookin. OTOH, get the lump lit and start cookin. Tryin to use them while they're still burnin down to coals will give ya tons of smoke that you may not want in the taste of your meat. Wouldn't chunks be difficult to start? On the bag it recommends stacking in pyramid and using newspaper. Wouldn't a chimney work? Oh shoot yeah, you can use a chimney to get some started but you may not have enough chunks for a cook fire. How about flavor? You'll definitely get more flavor from a bunch of chunks than you will from lump. Again, too much smoke taste may be more than you've bargained for. Not to mention a waste of good meat. My recommendation: Use lump for cookin and add a few chunks to add flavor. -- -frohe Life is too short to be in a hurry |
|
|||
|
frohe wrote:
Eddie wrote: what's the difference between chunks and lump? Chucks is raw wood that's been dried. Lump is dried chunks that have been partially burned. The bags say you can use chunks as a primary fuel instead of charcoal. Does chunk last as long as lump? The problem with usin chunks is the time in gettin them down to coals for cookin. OTOH, get the lump lit and start cookin. Tryin to use them while they're still burnin down to coals will give ya tons of smoke that you may not want in the taste of your meat. Wouldn't chunks be difficult to start? On the bag it recommends stacking in pyramid and using newspaper. Wouldn't a chimney work? Oh shoot yeah, you can use a chimney to get some started but you may not have enough chunks for a cook fire. How about flavor? You'll definitely get more flavor from a bunch of chunks than you will from lump. Again, too much smoke taste may be more than you've bargained for. Not to mention a waste of good meat. My recommendation: Use lump for cookin and add a few chunks to add flavor. Noddin' atcha, frohe. Jack Curry |
|
|||
|
"Eddie" wrote in message ... I was browsing at a Wal-Mart and found hickory wood chunks for $4.97 a 2/3 cubic foot bag. Weight about 19 lbs. I then did a web search and found a site that sells the same thing for $7.00 for a 1/3 cubic foot bag and weight of 10 lbs. Plus shipping charges. So, is Wal-Mart chunks a good buy? I would think so. Hickory is hickory. go for cheap. Better yet, seal from your neighbor's wood pile that he h as rotting in the yard from the fireplace that he never burned. I have never used hickory wood chunks before. Now for questions, what's the difference between chunks and lump? The bags say you can use chunks as a primary fuel instead of charcoal. Does chunk last as long as lump? Wouldn't chunks be difficult to start? On the bag it recommends stacking in pyramid and using newspaper. Wouldn't a chimney work? How about flavor? Lump charcoal is wood that had ben transformed to carbon by burning in a low oxygen environment. . Tha carbon will burn hot and have little smoke. Chunks are real wood. They will be a little harder to start, yo probably want to burn them down a bit before you start cooking on them. The best method is to add a few chunks in wiht the lump. Too much smoke is not good and this gives you better control. You do NOT need billowing smoke for the hickory to do its magic adding flavor. Yes, you can use a chimney to start it. Yes it can be used as a primary fuel. Experiment with a mix first and depending on how you cook and what cooker you have, the results will be more predicable Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:18:33 GMT, I needed a babel fish to understand
"frohe" : How about flavor? You'll definitely get more flavor from a bunch of chunks than you will from lump. Again, too much smoke taste may be more than you've bargained for. Not to mention a waste of good meat. My recommendation: Use lump for cookin and add a few chunks to add flavor. so... for smoking a Brisket, it would be advisable to use just chunks? I ask because several that have responded to the original question stated concern of "too much smoke" ruining the taste of the meat. I love cooking out doors, but I don't have a massive amount of experience, and I tend to try out various suggestions from friends and family. (like to learn from others mistakes if I can). Your time and insight are appreciated. |
|
|||
|
Lewzephyr wrote:
Your time and insight are appreciated. I suggest reading the FAQ at: http://www.eaglequest.com/~bbq/faq2/toc.html Dave |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 14:54:26 -0700, I needed a babel fish to
understand "Dave Bugg" deebuggatcharterdotnet : Lewzephyr wrote: Your time and insight are appreciated. I suggest reading the FAQ at: http://www.eaglequest.com/~bbq/faq2/toc.html Dave Thank you, there is a wealth of information there, and it has answered more than one (too many to count) of my questions... |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BARBEQUE WOOD TYPES | D | General Cooking | 15 | 17-02-2004 10:52 PM |
| Brine & wood questions | Mick | Barbecue | 3 | 23-01-2004 06:29 AM |
| Free BBQ wood (Repost) | Bob | Barbecue | 3 | 22-01-2004 01:38 AM |
| Wrangler wood chunks | Bill | Barbecue | 3 | 13-12-2003 06:26 AM |
| bge and wood chunks | beermeister | Barbecue | 5 | 06-11-2003 07:10 AM |