Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
Agenda for a New America
Part One The Politics of Vegetarianism By Vasu Murti Chapter 11 - Violence Meat-eating contributes to the fear in the world by putting us in a position in which there is not enough to go around. But that's not all. Meat-eaters ingest residues of the animal's biochemical response to the horrors of the slaughterhouse. Programmed to fight or flee when in danger for their lives, the animals react to the slaughterhouse in sheer terror. Powerful biochemical agents are secreted that pump through their bloodstreams and onto their flesh, energizing them to fight or flee for their lives. Like screaming air rain sirens, these chemical agents produce instinctual panic. Today's slaughterhouses virtually guarantee that the animals will die in terror. The Maoris would eat the flesh of a slaughtered enemy in order to possess the enemy's courage and strength. The people of the lower Nubia, likewise, would eat the fox, believing that by so doing, they would be possessed of his cunning. In upper Egypt, the heart of the hoopoe bird was eaten in order to acquire the ability to become a clever scribe. The bird would be caught and its heart would be torn out and eaten while it was still alive. On the other hand, certain Native American tribes would not eat the flesh of an animal who died in fear, because they did not want to take into themselves the terror of such an animal. When we eat animals who have died violent deaths we literally eat their fear. We take in biochemical agents designed by nature to tell an animal that its life is in the gravest danger, and it must either fight or flee for its life. And then, in our wars and our daily lives, we give expression to the panic in which the animals we have eater died. "Truly man is the king of beasts, for his brutality exceeds them. We live by the death of others. We are burial places! I have since an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men will look upon the murder of animals as they look upon the murder of man." - Leonardo da Vinci courtesy of http://www.all-creatures.org/article...-polveg11.html |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
/' /)
,/¯ / / / /´¯/' '/´¯¯·¸ /'/ / / /¨¨/¯\ ('( ´ ´ ¯&;/' ') \ ' / '\' \ _.·´ \ ( \ \ |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
I second the motion!
"Ol' Hippie" <olhippieATcharterDOTnet> wrote in message ... > /' /) > ,/¯ / > / / > /´¯/' '/´¯¯·¸ > /'/ / / /¨¨/¯\ > ('( ´ ´ ¯&;/' ') > \ ' / > '\' \ _.·´ > \ ( > \ \ > > |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
you moron veg heads need to make a stand. preferably in deer country while
in deer season, wear some deer camouflage and hang out with the deer.... "Ol' Herpes" > wrote in message om... > Agenda for a New America > Part One > The Politics of Vegetarianism > By Vasu Murti > Chapter 11 - Violence > > Meat-eating contributes to the fear in the world by putting us in a > position in which there is not enough to go around. But that's not > all. Meat-eaters ingest residues of the animal's biochemical response > to the horrors of the slaughterhouse. Programmed to fight or flee > when in danger for their lives, the animals react to the > slaughterhouse in sheer terror. Powerful biochemical agents are > secreted that pump through their bloodstreams and onto their flesh, > energizing them to fight or flee for their lives. > > Like screaming air rain sirens, these chemical agents produce > instinctual panic. Today's slaughterhouses virtually guarantee that > the animals will die in terror. > > The Maoris would eat the flesh of a slaughtered enemy in order to > possess the enemy's courage and strength. The people of the lower > Nubia, likewise, would eat the fox, believing that by so doing, they > would be possessed of his cunning. In upper Egypt, the heart of the > hoopoe bird was eaten in order to acquire the ability to become a > clever scribe. The bird would be caught and its heart would be torn > out and eaten while it was still alive. On the other hand, certain > Native American tribes would not eat the flesh of an animal who died > in fear, because they did not want to take into themselves the terror > of such an animal. > > When we eat animals who have died violent deaths we literally eat > their fear. We take in biochemical agents designed by nature to tell > an animal that its life is in the gravest danger, and it must either > fight or flee for its life. And then, in our wars and our daily > lives, we give expression to the panic in which the animals we have > eater died. > > "Truly man is the king of beasts, for his brutality exceeds them. We > live by the death of others. We are burial places! I have since an > early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men > will look upon the murder of animals as they look upon the murder of > man." - Leonardo da Vinci > > courtesy of http://www.all-creatures.org/article...-polveg11.html |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
|
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
>Subject: Violence
>From: meat_is_murder Ya bloody carrot killer!!!! Spud whacker!!! Celery hacker!!! Keep lauching yer wicked war-tide of mass Potato Genicide!!! One day, the ghosts of all those cabbages you slawtered ( get it, slaw-tered ;-) ) will come raging back to claim their revenge on your bloody wicked soul. You hate the carnivores yet you turn a deaf ear to the sound of flowers crying in the rain now don't you! Instant Karma's gonna getcha! capnron@cafemojo Q: What does a baby potato say to it's mother? A: "Mommy, I'm afraid the humans are going to peel my skin off alive, boil me in scalding water and then mash me into a gooey mesh. Why can't they just leave us alone peacefully here in the dirt where we can grow a green leaves that put oxygen in the air? Why mommy? Why? Why must they kill us?" Mother: "Because we taste good snuggems, now be quite and go to sleep." |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 22:53:14 -0600, "tecwhiz" >
wrote: >you moron veg heads need to make a stand. Who's the bigger moron? The moron posting obvious flame-bait, or the moron who allows himself to get manipulated into responding to obvious flame-bait? -- Kevin S. Wilson Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho "Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile." --Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
Kevin S. Wilson > wrote in message >. ..
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 22:53:14 -0600, "tecwhiz" > > wrote: > > >you moron veg heads need to make a stand. > > Who's the bigger moron? The moron posting obvious flame-bait, or the > moron who allows himself to get manipulated into responding to obvious > flame-bait? .... or the moron who feels compelled to flame the moron of the second part, who's responded indignantly to moron #1, who's basically trespassing his prejudices where they're not welcome. Pot, kettle, ...? |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
|
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
|
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message ... > On 3 Mar 2004 14:26:32 -0800, (Scarlet > Pimpernel) wrote: > > >Kevin S. Wilson > wrote in message >. .. > >> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 22:53:14 -0600, "tecwhiz" > > >> wrote: > >> > >> >you moron veg heads need to make a stand. > >> > >> Who's the bigger moron? The moron posting obvious flame-bait, or the > >> moron who allows himself to get manipulated into responding to obvious > >> flame-bait? > > > >... or the moron who feels compelled to flame the moron of the second > >part, who's responded indignantly to moron #1, who's basically > >trespassing his prejudices where they're not welcome. > > The person to whom Moron #2 is responding most likely doesn't read > follow-ups. If he does, he certainly doesn't care. My follow-up to > Moron #2 is much more likely to be read by Moron #2, who may therefore > reconsider the wisdom of responding to obvious flame-bait. In other > words, there's a point to my post, and a logical reason for it, unlike > the posts from either Moron #1 or Moron #2. > > >Pot, kettle, ...? > > If you say so. Of course, by your logic, you just became Moron #4. Quite. But in my case its for entirely sporting reasons ;-) |
|
|||
|
|||
Violence
the one who responds with only a question.
"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 22:53:14 -0600, "tecwhiz" > > wrote: > > >you moron veg heads need to make a stand. > > Who's the bigger moron? The moron posting obvious flame-bait, or the > moron who allows himself to get manipulated into responding to obvious > flame-bait? > > -- > Kevin S. Wilson > Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho > "Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile." > --Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stop the food violence | General Cooking | |||
Domestic violence this Christmas | General Cooking | |||
Violence towards women | General Cooking | |||
Sectarian Violence | Mexican Cooking | |||
Violence and Anger | Vegan |