Dave Bugg wrote:

Default User wrote:
Dave Bugg wrote:

Bill wrote:

Spamming is the only way the googlegoobers know. BTW, no need
to help them with his spamming. please snip the payload.

Or I can just kill-file you. Bye.

Hmm. I actually agree with Bill. If someone is spamming, why quote
the spam links?

Didn't much pay attention.

Fair enough, but I think then it's an overreaction to jump on Bill and
plonk him. You know how I love to plonk people, so *I* think it was
marginal, then . . .





Birna

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:23:00 GMT, "Dave Bugg"
wrote:

Denny Wheeler wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:21:13 GMT, "Dave Bugg"
wrote:

Please don't promote your forum/blog/website here. If you have an
answer, post it here; but don't use this NG as a pathway to your
site.

Dave, I don't know if what's on that page is 'the' answer, but it does
look like a good way to do brisket. Didn't see any obnoxious ads, nor
did I have to do anything other than click the link.

I'm thinkin' we might cut FatBoy some slack--QJoint looks like a legit
good site whose contents are on topic here.
(obviously only my opinion)

The objection I had was posting the 'you can find the answer here at this
website which is in desperate need for participants'. If he wants to put the
website in his sig line, no big deal. But if he wants to answer a question,
then I think he should just answer it on this NG.

With this position I agree. Be okay if he'd posted "do this, do that,
do the other -- and if you want more, there are pictures on thishere
webpage link".

But maybe he didn't know any better--now the explanation's there, and
perhaps Fatboy will heed.


"Every single religion that has a monotheistic god
winds up persecuting someone else."
-Philip Pullman
--
-denny-
(not as curmudgeonly as I useta be)