![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Baking (rec.food.baking) For bakers, would-be bakers, and fans and consumers of breads, pastries, cakes, pies, cookies, crackers, bagels, and other items commonly found in a bakery. Includes all methods of preparation, both conventional and not. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"Dave Bell" wrote in message ... Regarding those muffins: What would be a useable substitute for cornmeal, for non-sticking the batter? I can't eat corn, but some recipes just seem to need the separation the meal provides. Oats, perhaps? Maybe if I briefly ground rolled oats in the blender or spice mill? The coarse, steel-cut Scottish oats seem like they'd be too coarse, as-is. Dave The purpose of the cornmeal in this recipe is to prevent the muffins from sticking to the pan. If you have a heavy non-stick pan, you might try to eliminate the cornmeal. I think that oatmeal would work too. Elly |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
"Dave Bell" wrote in message ... Regarding those muffins: What would be a useable substitute for cornmeal, for non-sticking the batter? I can't eat corn, but some recipes just seem to need the separation the meal provides. Oats, perhaps? Maybe if I briefly ground rolled oats in the blender or spice mill? The coarse, steel-cut Scottish oats seem like they'd be too coarse, as-is. Dave rice flour. Comes in white or brown. |
|
|||
|
Dave Bell wrote:
Regarding those muffins: What would be a useable substitute for cornmeal, for non-sticking the batter? I can't eat corn, but some recipes just seem to need the separation the meal provides. Oats, perhaps? Maybe if I briefly ground rolled oats in the blender or spice mill? The coarse, steel-cut Scottish oats seem like they'd be too coarse, as-is. Semolina, which is a form of wheat, is a good alternative. Mike |
|
|||
|
Regarding those muffins: What would be a useable substitute for cornmeal, for non-sticking the batter? I can't eat corn, but some recipes just seem to need the separation the meal provides. Oats, perhaps? Maybe if I briefly ground rolled oats in the blender or spice mill? The coarse, steel-cut Scottish oats seem like they'd be too coarse, as-is. Semolina, which is a form of wheat, is a good alternative. Mike I use bread crumbs |
|
|||
|
Dave Bell wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Mike Avery wrote: Dave Bell wrote: Regarding those muffins: What would be a useable substitute for cornmeal, for non-sticking the batter? I can't eat corn, but some recipes just seem to need the separation the meal provides. Oats, perhaps? Maybe if I briefly ground rolled oats in the blender or spice mill? The coarse, steel-cut Scottish oats seem like they'd be too coarse, as-is. Semolina, which is a form of wheat, is a good alternative. Mike I can tolerate wheat a little better than corn, but try to avoid it. This small amount would probably be OK, though. Usually the English muffins are made of wheat. A little more or less on the baking surface shouldn't make any real difference. Mike |
|
|||
|
Thanks, Janet! I'll try it out...
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Janet Bostwick wrote: "Dave Bell" wrote in message ea.net... On Sun, 22 May 2005, Janet Bostwick wrote: "Dave Bell" wrote in message ... Regarding those muffins: What would be a useable substitute for cornmeal, for non-sticking the batter? I can't eat corn, but some recipes just seem to need the separation the meal provides. Oats, perhaps? Maybe if I briefly ground rolled oats in the blender or spice mill? The coarse, steel-cut Scottish oats seem like they'd be too coarse, as-is. Dave rice flour. Comes in white or brown. Doesn't get too sticky? That would be perfect for me... Thanks, Dave No, it's perfect for non-stick. Just be careful to not use a lot, you just want a light dusting, otherwise you get the crunchy feeling in the mouth. Use it also for dusting dough that you are putting in baskets or linen to rise, it gives great release. If you want the flour markings from the basket, sprinkle the basket lightly with the rice flour then regular flour over that. I use a small, fine mesh strainer to sprinkle the rice flour evenly. Janet Janet |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Mike Avery wrote:
Dave Bell wrote: I can tolerate wheat a little better than corn, but try to avoid it. This small amount would probably be OK, though. Usually the English muffins are made of wheat. A little more or less on the baking surface shouldn't make any real difference. Mike Of course - unless I make them myself, with spelt! Dave |
|
|||
|
Dave Bell wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Mike Avery wrote: Dave Bell wrote: I can tolerate wheat a little better than corn, but try to avoid it. This small amount would probably be OK, though. Usually the English muffins are made of wheat. A little more or less on the baking surface shouldn't make any real difference. Mike Of course - unless I make them myself, with spelt! Spelt IS wheat. It is a primitive wheat, that is tolerated by some people who can't tolerate modern wheats. However, for many people, it's just wheat. For people with gluten sensitivities, spelt is a no-no. I DO wish vita-spelt hadn't used that misleading advertising campaign touting spelt as a wheat alternative. Mike |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Mike Avery wrote:
Spelt IS wheat. It might be more accurate to say that what we now call wheat is spelt, or a descendant of spelt. It is a primitive wheat, that is tolerated by some people who can't tolerate modern wheats. However, for many people, it's just wheat. For people with gluten sensitivities, spelt is a no-no. And I am one that can tolerate much more spelt than wheat. If I eat enough of it, or *whole* spelt, I get a similar reaction as from wheat. Still less severe and shorter duration, though. Case in point: Last night we were joining a group of friends for a dinner at Chevy's (California Mexican chain.) Before heading out, I made up a batch of half a dozen spelt tortillas to bring with me. Ended up pigging out and eating the entire stack with my habanero steak fajitas, amounting to 1.5 cups of white spelt flour. *Very* mild reaction, well within my "It was worth it!" tolerance level... I DO wish vita-spelt hadn't used that misleading advertising campaign touting spelt as a wheat alternative. Mike For some, it is. As usual, each individual is different, and needs to take responsibility for his own health! Dave |
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... George, Your recipe is great! I finally finished off the bread I had on hand and made a batch of English Muffins using your recipe. The muffins have the larger holes. Thanks a lot. BobbiJo Me too! Made a 2nd batch yesterday. Thanks! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ Recipes (part 2 of 2) | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 0 | 17-04-2005 06:28 AM |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ Recipes (part 1 of 2) | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 0 | 29-03-2005 07:36 AM |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ Recipes (part 1 of 2) | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 0 | 11-03-2005 06:30 AM |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ Recipes (part 1 of 2) | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 1 | 22-11-2004 06:16 AM |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ Recipes (part 2 of 2) | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 0 | 04-08-2004 06:16 AM |