Alan writes:

How about a synopsis of significant discussion? Sort of a "Cliffs
Notes" for tea-lovers. Out-and-out fallacies could be identified as
such, while less-absolute topics could be summarized with the
different schools of thought.

That could be useful. But I was proposing something far simpler: just
the out-and-out fallacies. The three I proposed are all falsified by
measurements that have already been taken.

/Lew
---
Lew Perin /
http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html