Jon Binkley wrote in message
.com...
On May 8, 5:33 am, (GregS) wrote:

I hear troll but no comments. I have no idea what they talk about. I did
want to get comments.

OK. While this sort of legislation inherently rubs me the wrong
way, I won't pretend for a second that I don't like the results.

fortunately the circuit is known for being the fruits and nuts of the
judiciary. Hopefully, the other circuits and the Supremes can understand
that we have a compelling interest which overrides the right to smoking

It's nice to come home not smelling like an ashtray, and
it's genuinely a bit of a shock now when I first enter a bar in
a state that still allows smoking, and I get hit with that first
blast of rank, stale smoke.

However, I think some of the 2nd-hand smoke claims are a
bit specious, and I think that nearly as good results could
be achieved by aggressive ventilation.

We'll investigate Monday.

mk5000

"However, I have here is a marginal note to a pslam book dated 1617:
" This book was written by the humble monk Tzvetan, on order of master
George, the blessed archbishop of Justiniana the First; of all Bulgarians
and Serbs, of Macedonia, Albania, Bosnia, Ugrovlachia and the rest Dacian
lands patriarch and holder. The ear of AD 1617....."--baba ginka