15-02-2007, 03:06 AM
posted to alt.religion.the-last-church,alt.comedy.british,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan
|
|
|
Is sex with animals always wrong?
On Feb 14, 8:40 am, Martin Willett
wrote:
ricky's babysitter wrote:
Dutch wrote:
"Michael Rippie" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:11:45 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:
"Martin Willett" wrote
Why is sex with animals considered wrong? Is this something to do with
the
rights of animals, the moral duties of man or the nature of consent?
I think that it's mainly a cultural taboo, rather than an actual "wrong"
act, assuming the animal is not harmed, like showing the soles of your
feet
in China, something like that. The roots of the taboo are likely pretty
obscure, maybe related to early religious beliefs.
Dear dumb and dumber.
Sex with animals is always wrong. Can you spell STD's
That doesn't make it wrong, inasmuch as it's accurate, it makes it unwise.
You can go back to your toys now...
tell your buddy ~jonnie~ to quit cramming gerbils in his
ass...............
Medical literature, which covers examples of items retrieved from
patients' rectums in extreme detail, has never recorded a case of an
animal being removed from a patient, nor of damage inflicted on a
patient's insides due to rectal insertion of an animal. - source Wikipedia
http://mwillett.org/mind/animal-sex.htm
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Who ever said Goo needed medical attention because of it?
|