????? wrote:
"notbob" wrote in message
news:NMwjc.30375$0u6.5326677@attbi_s03...
heh heh....

So says the lawyer who is suing the Chuck-O-Rama on behalf of a
couple of Atkin's dieters 86'ed for practicing roast beef abuse. It
would appear the trial will hinge on whether restaurant had the
right to boot the bootees, claiming the restaurant is not really an
all-you-can-eat establishment. I must confess, I've never seen a
buffet that wasn't all-you-can-eat. But, in fact, the definition of
buffet clearly fails to resolve this quandry. Perhaps this trial
will lay to rest this pressing socio-political issue. In the
meantime, I'm gonna fix myself a salami-cheese-salami sandwich!

nb

Interesting that someone on a "diet" eats 18 slices of roast beef.

The end (Atkins diet) apparently justifies the means.

Jill