Thread: Wine Critics
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2006, 06:03 PM posted to alt.food.wine
Ronin[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default Wine Critics


wrote in message
ps.com...
What Max writes is utter rubbish. Wines are not for 'tastsing' but for
drinking, and can only be evaluated (if they have to be evaluated) in
the context of a meal. Everything else is a complete waste of time. Why
do wines have to be evaluated anyway? Are you obsessed with having
something with more points? Why can't you just drink and enjoy? True
connoisseurs do not engage in such lunacy. I don't care how many points
my wine gets by any critic, and I NEVER have tastings, ever. I consider
this some kind of sick joke.

Grow up, people!


So, how *do* you buy wine? By label? Cost? Shape of the pretty bottle?

I taste, and over 50 years of drinking wine, have found I can tell pretty
much how a wine will "drink" with a particular style of food. But I'm not
going to plunk down cash for a case of wine I haven't tasted, no matter what
any critic says. Then after tasting, and deciding it suits my purpose, I'll
buy and 'drink and enjoy'.


 

Personal Loans - Loans - Auto Loans - Nepal Trekking - Loans