View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2006, 05:10 PM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan
dh@.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Goo insults his own self.

On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 04:34:25 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:

dh@. wrote
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 01:34:29 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:


"You are not morally entitled to feel satisfaction that an animal got to
experience life when you consume animal products."

"We should feel good if animals are given good treatment."

"The method of husbandry determines whether or not the life
has positive or negative value to the animal."


You are not morally entitled to feel satisfaction that an animal got to
experience life when you consume animal products.

[...]

You proved once again that you had no idea what you were
pasting when you pasted the fact that life can have positive
value. You had no clue then, you have no clue now, so most
likely in another couple of years you still will have no clue. It's
one of the many pitifully amusing things about all this.
 

Loans - Debt Consolidation - Credit Cards - Mortgage Calculator - Pink Ranger