Scented Nectar wrote:

Her wording is irrelevant. The only relevant thing is
the belief, and my wording ACCURATELY describes what
her belief was.


No you only get points for being close.
Once I saw the improved wording that
Retard did

That bullshit wording of his is not any improvement at
all, and it does NOT represent your original thinking.
You may wish to pretend it represents your current
thinking, but it does not represent your original
thinking at all. Your original thinking did not limit
your sense of your virtue to not causing harm to
"farmed" animals. You DID believe that you were not
causing harm to ANY animals.

To the extent that Retard's dishonest and too-narrow
formulation reflects your thinking now, it represents
your fallback position.