On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:52:21 -0700, crymad wrote:

Derek wrote:

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:57:34 -0700, crymad wrote:

Actually, you need to look no further than yourself when asking about
the reputation of brown rice. When I asked what exactly was so good
about brown rice, you replied that it had cholesterol-lowering
unsaturated fats. This claim appears to be bunk, a product of the power
of myth.

Sorry, Crymad, but the above paragraph is just wrong.

Even your own links have listed monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats as
components of brown rice. So how can the claim be "bunk"? Are you going to
discount the very references you've been using?

The claim isn't bunk, it's just not particularly meaningful when brown rice
has only 3% of the recommended daily values of each type.

I took your comment to mean that brown rice was a good source of
cholesterol-lowering fats. We both seem to be in agreement that the
amount is actually insignificant.

Yes, yes. Agreement.

I merely pointed out their presence not their abundance. But I can see how
that could be misconstrued.

--
Derek

Failu When your best just isn't good enough.