"williamwaller" wrote in message =
news:mailman.0.1095609415.536.rec.food.sourdough@m ail.otherwhen.com...

My @#$%^&* camera is on the fritz. It was one of those cheap H-
P's that came with my Mac. So I cannot accommodate you. Sadly, the=20
big hole loaves are about to be toast this morning g.

That is understandable. Kenneth, who has been here for years,=20
and who has every gadget known to mankind, has never succeeded to=20
produce a graphic. "Bob", who was the most prodigious exploiter=20
ever of effusive nomenclature at r.f.s. finally produced an image=20
of a Schlotzky Bun wannabe, as I recall, but I can't find it=20
anymore. Maybe that should give us some hope, anyway.

Bob's wife would not let him use the scanner for bread, which was=20
very sad. But not so sad as a busted crappy digital camera, I=20
guess.

Moving on...I am quite anxious to see how this lamination process=20
works for whole grain loaves.

Well, you will probably have better luck than I would,=20
particularly since you have no way to create a record of your=20
results. The secret is to just wait a few days before attempting=20
to recall and describe the degree of success you achieved. =20
Actually, waiting several weeks is better. My doctor always=20
waits for several months before recording the results of my=20
physical examinations. That is why I am so healthy.

Maybe it is time to revisit the Schlotzky Bun. It is something=20
like we have been talking about. Scroll down at=20
http://www.schlotzskys.com/. I have been thinking about=20
making one bun at a time in my experiments so as not to waste=20
flour.

--=20
DickA=20