View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2003, 04:07 PM
H.J. van der Veen
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crianza?....Marques de Caceres. / partly hitting the bell

Right. I got the meaning. Sorry about the misunderstanding.

Regards,

Hillebrand.

"Dale Williams" wrote in message
...
In article , "H.J. van der

Veen"
writes:

al the mayor wineries (like
Marques de Caceres) tend not to do that, so the backlabel should give you

an
indication. It might well be, though, that they are sending declassified
wines tot the USA. And of course those wines will be good quality, but

they
are considered less by the winery itself. In


Hillebrand,

I think we have a slight misunderstanding. I'm the one that posted "As to
usage, I don'tthink there's any formal rule, but if I name a Rioja from a

big
house that
makes a full-line and don't say Reserva or Gran Reserva, you can pretty

much
bet it's a Crianza. If I saw "Marques de Caceres Rioja" in an ad, I'd be
pretty sure it was the Crianza."

I'm not saying that the wine doesn't say Crianza on label. I referring to
spoken Winegeek.
Just as I assume if one says "97 Mondavi Cabernet" that they mean the Napa
bottling, not the Private Reserve or Oakville, I assume if someone says
Viticcio Chianti Classico they don't mean the CCR. So if I hear Marques

de
Caceres Rioja with no qualifer, I'm assuming it's the Crianza until told
differently.
Obviously many folks here are better critical thinkers here than I, and

would
not make such willy-nilly assumptions. :-)

Dale

Dale Williams
Drop "damnspam" to reply



 

News - Remortgages - Online Advertising - McDonalds - Car Loan