Why is JethroUK so horribly afraid to answer simple and good questions?
"Wilson Woods" wrote in message
nk.net...
JethroUK© wrote:
"not a philosopher" wrote in message
news:FvPpc.164748$f_5.142824@lakeread01...
"Wilson Woods" wrote in message
ink.net...
: JethroUK, clearly a coward, keeps EVADING simple and
: legitimate questions.
:
: Jethro wrote,
:
: "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to
: raise it at all?"
:
: "i'll rephrase that - is it better to raise an
: animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
: at all?"
:
: "i'll try again - is it more/less moral to raise an
: animal to consume (wider sense), or not to raise it
: at all?"
It is better not to raise an animal at all rather than to
raise it to slaughter and eat.
but if you are going to eat it anyway - it's better (for animalkind)
No such thing.
Ok - it's better the animal world as a whole - is that easier for you to
grasp?
First it damages the human spirit to eat other animals, IMO.
depends on the idividual - you cant speak for everyone
You seem to think you can speak for all of
"animalkind", you idiot.
facts dear boy, are evident! - the gene pool alone benefits from a larger
populous - how much evidence would you like?
|