On Jul 3, 4:33*pm, Rupert wrote:
On Jul 2, 11:17*pm, Rudy Canoza wrote:





Rupert wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:04 am, Rudy Canoza wrote:
You sure did slink away quietly from the "inefficiency" issue. *I showed
conclusively that ****witted "vegans" see their bullshit "inefficiency"
argument against meat as something entirely separate from an
environmental argument, and you just threw in the white towel, after
waving it weakly for a few minutes.

What the **** possessed you to argue for so long from such a weak
position of ignorance, anyway? *I guess it must have been your usual
partisanship.

Just to comment on this one more time,

[snip worthless shit hemorrhage]

Your first comment, acknowledging the lame and feckless concession, was
sufficient.

Still think "axiomatisable" is not a real word, Ball?

When you snip and evade this question, will that be just a tiny bit
lame?

You finally got around to adequately arguing your point, and when I
saw an adequate argument I agreed with you. Nothing lame there.-


Poor Boobs. He finally gets something half-assed right and you concede
that point to him and he simply can't handle it. He can't just accept
it, he has to keep on arguing because he thinks he can replay his
solitary once-in-a-lifetime victory over and over and over and over.

He's never been right about anything before you know.