View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2008, 08:33 AM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan
Rupert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 590
Default rupie concedes

On Jul 2, 11:17*pm, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Rupert wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:04 am, Rudy Canoza wrote:
You sure did slink away quietly from the "inefficiency" issue. *I showed
conclusively that ****witted "vegans" see their bullshit "inefficiency"
argument against meat as something entirely separate from an
environmental argument, and you just threw in the white towel, after
waving it weakly for a few minutes.


What the **** possessed you to argue for so long from such a weak
position of ignorance, anyway? *I guess it must have been your usual
partisanship.


Just to comment on this one more time,


[snip worthless shit hemorrhage]

Your first comment, acknowledging the lame and feckless concession, was
sufficient.


Still think "axiomatisable" is not a real word, Ball?

When you snip and evade this question, will that be just a tiny bit
lame?

You finally got around to adequately arguing your point, and when I
saw an adequate argument I agreed with you. Nothing lame there.
 

Loans - Internet Advertising - Loans - Myspace Stuff - Loan