rupie concedes
On Jul 2, 11:17*pm, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Rupert wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:04 am, Rudy Canoza wrote:
You sure did slink away quietly from the "inefficiency" issue. *I showed
conclusively that ****witted "vegans" see their bullshit "inefficiency"
argument against meat as something entirely separate from an
environmental argument, and you just threw in the white towel, after
waving it weakly for a few minutes.
What the **** possessed you to argue for so long from such a weak
position of ignorance, anyway? *I guess it must have been your usual
partisanship.
Just to comment on this one more time,
[snip worthless shit hemorrhage]
Your first comment, acknowledging the lame and feckless concession, was
sufficient.
Still think "axiomatisable" is not a real word, Ball?
When you snip and evade this question, will that be just a tiny bit
lame?
You finally got around to adequately arguing your point, and when I
saw an adequate argument I agreed with you. Nothing lame there.
|