Goo - ****wit David Harrison, THE GOOBER, a colossally stupid ****wit
and a stupid credulous Southern Baptist shitworm - lied and presented no
challenge:
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:33:34 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:

Goo - ****wit David Harrison, THE GOOBER, a colossally stupid ****wit and a stupid credulous Southern Baptist shitworm - lied and presented no challenge:
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:27:27 GMT, "Dutch" wrote:
People who appreciate mice or livestock, normally are appreciating live
ones, not wanting there to be more of them so that can "experience life",
that's the nonsense aspect with your position.
You need to explain why we should not consider the lives
of animals. Hey I know what...try doing it NOW:
Because there's no point to it.

There is if

There isn't.

Anyway, Goo, it is established beyond doubt that you have no
consideration for animals; *ONLY* for the products you get from them.


In fact it's probably the most pointless
idea I've ever heard. If animals exist we ought to consider the conditions
we provide them, that's it.


Sure, they're
tasty, but do they appreciate life more than mice?
I believe even very young chickens do. That is
from personal experience around both.
So just being destined to be eaten makes an animal appreciate life,
Of course that's not it.

or what is it?
Try again.
I think mice are more intelligent than either chickens or cows,
but not pigs.

At least that explains why you oppose some livestock in favor
of mice,

No, because he doesn't.

You're too stupid a cracker for this, Goo.