I'll take that to mean you couldn't prove it then Mike. You know
taking off the 'k' doesn't alter that fact that you typed '****' Mike.
Nobody is going to be having to guess at that cryptic message. It's
funny how you can't type '****' without trying to disguise it but you
are happy to try to slander me. I don't care Mike, I don't think
having a drink is a big deal. I wasn't drinking anything but PG Tips
tea at the time as I am now though Mike, not that it would be a
problem if I were having a large Brandy. It's not illegal or immoral.
But you do seem to have a problem with it. You also seem to have a
problem understanding simple English Mike if you think I must have
been on some other plane when I wrote that. Oh well, it will come to
you if you keep trying.

Jim

TG wrote:

If you're going to
accuse me of guessing and talking Bull Shit at peoples answers and say
'I can prove that', then you'd better prove it.


On 3 Apr, 15:31, Mike Romain wrote:

What part of "who the fuc! do you think you are to tell me what to do"
do you not get?

....
Based on that experience, I would 'guess' that rolling up undesolved
yeast like mentioned in a jellyroll way, would likely make the big holes
folks look for in their 'rustic' Sourdough bread rather than interfere
or add to the rise of the sourdough itself as Viince's method does.

Mike