Dutch wrote:
dh@. wrote in message ...
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Boo wrote:

dh@. wrote
The "it" you're referring to is to stop being considerate of
livestock.

Can you give a good reason to prefer that livestock exist over mice
except
that they are more useful?

I would prefer mice in the house than livestock,
but I kill mice when they come in even so.

Why do you prefer livestock over mice "experiencing life"?

Heh heh heh...****wit doesn't actually like *any* animals, as animals;
he only likes animal products. Mice don't yield any products, so
****wit has no use for them.

Dutch, ****wit's phony valuation of animals' "getting to experience
life" is so *obviously* phony. He doesn't care about animals at all;
****wit only cares about products from animals.


They're bigger, but that's not a good reason,
that just means there will be fewer of them, fewer animal to "experience
life".

Can you in any way appreciate the fact that mice
experience life?

*YOU* can't, ****wit. But that's because you don't give a shit about
any animals at all.

In any case, there's nothing to "appreciate"; so, rather strangely,
****wit, you're right not to appreciate it.


If not, then why do you keep bringing it up?

If so, then try explaining why you think that same
consideration should not be applied to all animals.

I don't hear you complaining that people don't appreciate mice, it's
always livestock. What's the big thing you have with livestock? Sure,
they're tasty, but do they appreciate life more than mice?

****wit *only* likes the products; he places no value whatever on
animals' "getting to experience life; that is obviously and irrefutably
just a smokescreen for ****wit.