Kevo writes:

On Mar 29, 10:06*am, cha bing wrote:
Is there such a thing as pu-er that is too old?

[...1920s tea isn't necessarily too old...]

On the other hand, one cannot ignore the quality & production
process of the pu-er - a low quality maocha & poor production
process pu-er made in the recent years might not even last a decade.

This sounds reasonable, but I wonder how much is really known about
how a Pu'er's characteristics at birth influence its quality decades
later. Is there a way to know what some of the great old teas were
like as maocha? Were they "quality tea" by standards we would
recognize?

/Lew
---
Lew Perin /
http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html