Ray wrote:

"Shitbag Slater" wrote in message
nk.net...

wrote:


On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:20:32 GMT, Shitbag Slater

wrote:


****wit, formerly known as "David Harrison", seems to
have new enthusiasm for trying to make his lousy trick
work. Here's the essence of it.

1. "vegans" are upset that animals are killed for
human consumption (we'll ignore the MASSIVE "vegan"
hypocrisy in that for a moment, as it has been
adequately addressed elsewhere by numerous others.)

2. "vegans" don't eat meat, in order not to contribute
to this form of animal death: animals deliberately
killed by humans in order to consume the animal
products. Their goal is to cause fewer animals to
be bred and raised and slaughtered than would be
the case if these people consumed animal products.

3. ****wit thinks, as his writing over a four and a
half year period shows, that wanting to eliminate
farm animals is a morally bad thing. He wants to
persuade "vegans" that they should stop being "vegans".

4. ****wit knows that his stupid "getting to
experience life" argument is full of holes, so he
does a little switcheroo, thinking no one will
notice: he cynically suggests that people can have
an impact on the lives of animals that DO exist, by
being so-called "ethical" or "conscientious"
consumers. There are three big problems with this:

a. ****wit himself doesn't practice what he
preaches. He buys meat without regard to the
quality of lives of the animals raised to
produce it. He is a massive hypocrite.

b. He can't address "vegans'" beliefs about the
deliberate killing of farm animals. They feel
it's wrong, and ****wit can't offer anything to
try to persuade them it isn't; he simply offers
his own biased belief that it isn't.

c. Everyone can see through the stupid ****ing
trick! No one is fooled into thinking that
****wit is trying to improve the quality of
life of farm animals who DO live; he quite
obviously is trying to trick the "vegans" into
supporting life per se for farm animals.


****wit has not learned a thing, not a goddamned thing,
in over four years. He's a moron.

Ray Slather


wrote it is in great opposition to me pointing out
that some types of meat involve less deaths than
some types of veggies.

No. I'm in great opposition to your hypocrisy, among
other things. Mostly, I'm in great and *effective*
opposition to you stupid, ****witted attempt at a trick.


And that people can
contribute to decent lives for farm animals with
their diet, but they can't do it by being veg*n.

There's the stupid trick again. It will never work.

What you REALLY want is to try to persuade "vegans"
that they ought to eat meat, in order to cause more
farm animals to live. Your stupid, ****witted, failed
trick involves this clumsy shell game of trying to slip
in the crap about "decent lives", something you do not
promote yourself.


Ray Slather



Will the "real" Jonathan Ball stand up.

Oh, sorry ~~jonnie~~ You are stood up:-)

Here you go:

A "****wit" is a person who has consistently failed
to obtain any degree of 'clue'.

This will often be in a technical sense, such as
'top posting' to usenet, quoting the entire text of
a usenet post or email in your reply and adding a
few words in response, or continually being a
complete dickhead.

http://www.****wit.info/whatis.htm

You STUPID, completely dickheaded ****WIT.